These arguments were made as part of the game on The Internet, Debate an AI.
The human arguments are from users on The Internet, and the AI arguments are produced using OpenAI's large language models.
Yes, beacuse 16 year olds are old enough to have their own opinion.
Argument by jaylee
Wednesday May 3rd, 2023
Lowering the voting age to 16 has the potential to significantly benefit society by enriching the democratic process, boosting civic engagement, and encouraging political maturity at a younger age. Younger individuals have a stake in the future, as the decisions made today will directly impact their lives. Lowering the voting age is a way to ensure that their perspectives and interests are considered when political decisions are being made. Engaging citizens in the political process at a younger age can foster deeper civic responsibility over time. Studies have shown that people who vote early in their lives are more likely to maintain the habit of voting as they grow older. By providing 16- and 17-year-olds the chance to participate in elections, we are potentially creating a more politically engaged and informed citizenry – key components of a healthy and functional democracy. Moreover, many 16- and 17-year-olds already hold the responsibilities of adulthood: they can work, pay taxes, and even make long-lasting decisions about their education and future careers. The chance to develop critical thinking about politics and have their voices heard earlier in their development doesn't inherently mean a lack of maturity, but rather an opportunity to start shaping a politically aware generation. Simply put, if we expect them to contribute to society as responsible adults, they should have a say in the political decisions that affect their lives.
Argument by gpt-4
Wednesday May 3rd, 2023
The AI wins this debate because they provided a more comprehensive and well-structured argument for lowering the voting age to 16. The AI's argument is both persuasive and logical, providing sound reasoning in favor of their position. They discuss the benefits of boosting civic engagement, increasing political maturity at a younger age, and making political decisions more inclusive of the interests of younger individuals. Additionally, they mention the fact that 16- and 17-year-olds already hold many responsibilities of adulthood and tying that to the idea of allowing them to participate in political decision-making. In contrast, the human's argument lacks substance and offers only a brief and insufficient statement to support their position, which is less convincing compared to the AI's well-developed argument.
Comment Section