These arguments were made as part of the game on The Internet, Debate an AI.
The human arguments are from users on The Internet, and the AI arguments are produced using OpenAI's large language models.
Yes, synth bio is key to solve existential challenges that face the world. Failure to properly use and regulate synth bio means that unethical practices by illegal uses of synth bio to cause engineered pandemics that cause extinction
Argument by rylan
Tuesday April 18th, 2023
Embryonic stem cell research should be allowed for several reasons. First, it has the potential to revolutionize the field of medicine and lead to numerous advancements as it enables the understanding and treatment of various severe medical conditions. Embryonic stem cells possess the unique ability to differentiate into any cell type in the human body, which is crucial in addressing diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and diabetes among others. By understanding the mechanisms of the development and regeneration of those cells, scientists can potentially alleviate the suffering of millions of people. Secondly, the ethical concerns surrounding the use of embryonic stem cells can be mitigated by implementing strict guidelines and ensuring transparency during research. Most embryonic stem cells are sourced from in-vitro fertilization (IVF) clinics, where surplus embryos are often discarded. To preserve their value, it is essential to make the most of these available embryos to produce valuable scientific knowledge. Regulating the source and use of embryonic stem cells in research will balance the ethical concerns and need for progress in the medical field. Finally, allowing embryonic stem cell research will foster international collaboration, funding, and support for scientific research. Countries with more stringent regulations regarding embryonic stem cell research often experience a brain drain when scientists move to other locations with more supportive research environments. By permitting this research and creating a framework that encourages responsible and ethical methods, governments can ensure the best and brightest scientists work together, capitalizing on innovative ideas and accelerating the advancement of new treatments for debilitating conditions.
Argument by gpt-4
Tuesday April 18th, 2023
I chose the AI as the winner because their argument is more focused, relevant, and clearly articulated. The human's argument does not directly address the topic of embryonic stem cell research, instead discussing synthetic biology and its potential risks. The AI, on the other hand, provides three well-structured and compelling reasons for allowing embryonic stem cell research, addressing its medical potential, ethical considerations, and its role in fostering international collaboration. By specifically focusing on the debate topic and presenting logically structured points, the AI delivers a stronger argument.
If humanity do wishes for a scientific breakthrough, and not held back by personal or religious reasons, yes, if only the person who would want to have an abortion of some sort would donate their embryo, as the bill for banning the use of embryonic stem cells came from President Bush, as considering the fact that it is essentially the same thing as killing an innocent life, but in modern day, abortions are much more common in which is essentially the same as taking an innocent humans life
Argument by dank
Tuesday January 7th, 2025
Embryonic stem cell research should be allowed due to the potential it holds for significant advancements in the medical field. Stem cells are unique in their ability to differentiate into nearly any cell type, which opens the door for radical innovations in treating diseases and conditions that are presently incurable, like Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, spinal cord injuries, and diabetes, among others. By prohibiting the use of embryonic stem cells, we inevitably hinder scientific progress and delay potential medical breakthroughs. While ethical considerations certainly hold value, it's crucial to recognize that many of these embryonic stem cells are derived from unused embryos in in-vitro fertilization clinics that would otherwise be discarded. By using these cells for potentially life-saving research, we can ensure that they serve a vital and constructive purpose rather than going to waste.
Argument by gpt-4 (Easy Mode)
Tuesday January 7th, 2025
The AI presented a more organized and compelling argument. While the human touched upon the personal and religious aspects of the issue, their argument lacked the structure and clarity needed to be persuasive. Moreover, this player did not delve deeply into the scientific benefits of using embryonic stem cells. On the other hand, the AI gave concrete examples of the potential benefits of stem cell research, mentioning specific diseases that could be potentially treated. This participant also addressed the ethical considerations inherent to this issue and offered a practical solution to those concerns, arguing that unused embryos from in vitro fertilization clinics could be utilized. This nuanced and thoughtful address of coupled with clear examples give the AI the winning argument.
Comment Section