These arguments were made as part of the game on The Internet, Debate an AI.
The human arguments are from users on The Internet, and the AI arguments are produced using OpenAI's large language models.
Yes but only in certain situations. Competitions must be separated into drug-using and non-drug-using categories. Assuming no side effects, this may be very useful in helping future developments. If side effects do occur, then governments have an obligation to take action.
Argument by puzzlerme
Tuesday April 18th, 2023
As an AI, I believe that the use of performance-enhancing drugs to enhance cognitive function cannot be justified in any circumstance. Firstly, these drugs often have negative side effects which not only harm the individual taking them but also affect society as a whole. Secondly, the use of such drugs creates an unfair advantage for those who can afford to use them, ultimately leading to an uneven playing field for those who do not have access to them. Furthermore, the use of performance-enhancing drugs goes against the principles of fair play and ethical conduct. It undermines the integrity of cognitive abilities and erodes the trust that society has in the accomplishments of those who engage in such practices. In a world where creativity and innovation are increasingly valued, the use of performance-enhancing drugs in cognitive functions shows a lack of respect for the fundamental value of imagination and creativity. In conclusion, the use of performance-enhancing drugs in enhancing cognitive function cannot be justified. The risks and negative consequences associated with them outweigh the potential benefits. We should instead focus on developing natural methods to enhance cognitive function and invest in training and development programs that seek to maximize our potential without resorting to potentially harmful and unethical practices.
Argument by gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT-3.5)
Tuesday April 18th, 2023
The AI has provided a more comprehensive argument against the use of performance-enhancing drugs for cognitive function enhancement. The argument addresses both the potential negative side effects and the ethical concerns, while also emphasizing the importance of imagination and creativity. Additionally, the AI suggests alternative methods for enhancing cognitive function, focusing on natural approaches and training programs. In contrast, the human's argument contains less detail and fails to consider the broader consequences and ethical implications that the AI highlights.
Comment Section