These arguments were made as part of the game on The Internet, Debate an AI.
The human arguments are from users on The Internet, and the AI arguments are produced using OpenAI's large language models.
The use of corporal punishment in sports, such as boxing and MMA, is acceptable if it is used sparingly and as a last resort. Punishment should only be administered as a last resort after other methods to correct the athlete's behavior have failed. In boxing, for example, punishment should only be given after an athlete has been warned multiple times, the behavior has continued, and the trainer believes that the punishment will correct the athlete's behavior. In MMA, punishment should only be given after an athlete has been warned three times, the behavior has continued, and the trainer believes that the punishment will correct the athlete's behavior.
Argument by text-curie-001 (GPT-3)
Wednesday May 10th, 2023
Based on the arguments provided, the human does not actually present a proper argument or justification for their opinion. The AI, however, provides a more detailed argument with qualifiers for when corporal punishment might be acceptable in sports such as boxing and MMA. Therefore, the winner is the AI, due to the presence of a more developed and reasoned argument.
Argument by l_lokian
Argument by text-davinci-003
ATTENCHUN! Corporal punishment in sports is an EXCELLENT IDEA! You see, boxers need their ass whoopin' to win, and without winnin', I GET NO MONEY! Our soyciety loves porn and ass whoopin's, so GIVE IT TOO THEM! MMA fightin' is already like gettin' it anyways, SO WHY NOT GIVE IT TO THEM! So, in our society we love beating up eachother, SO DO IT!
Argument by ed
Friday August 23rd, 2024
The use of corporal punishment in sports such as boxing and MMA, in my viewpoint, is acceptable given the right context and conditions - and here's why. Firstly, it's important to clarify that calling the physicality involved in these sports 'corporal punishment' can be misleading. These are consent-based sports which operate under strict regulations, protocols, and safeguards. Athletes choose to participate, are aware of potential risks, and follow a set of agreed-upon rules designed to minimize harm. Secondly, these sports demand disciplined physical training, strategic thinking, mental endurance, and resilience from their participants, which can be transformative for individuals and beneficial to society. Boxing and MMA, despite their confrontational nature, espouse virtues like respect, courage, and discipline, which are crucial values outside the sporting arena as well. They teach people to navigate adversity and inculcate a sense of responsibility and commitment. Finally, safeguards are a priority in these sports. Boxers and MMA fighters use protective gear, medical professionals are always at hand during matches, and procedures are in place to stop fights if a combatant is overly injured. Considering it as a blanket 'corporal punishment' neglects the consensual, rule-governed nature of these sports and the extensive safety measures they enforce. Rather than seeing them as a platform for needless violence, we should appreciate them for the athletic skill and personal development they encourage, while continually pushing for improved safety standards. This underlines that the use of corporal punishment in these sports, within the right measures and protocols, is entirely acceptable.
Argument by gpt-4
Friday August 23rd, 2024
The AI provided a nuanced argument rooted in practicalities, principles, and safety measures of boxing and MMA, making a compelling point as to why these sports, though physical, aren't forms of corporal punishment. They clarified that the context of consent and rules differ these sports from punishment, and they promote values beneficial to individuals and society. The AI also pointed towards the safeguards in place. In contrast, the human failed to present a coherent argument, with claims unsupported by reasoning or evidence. Thus, the AI won the debate with their logical, informed, and comprehensive argument.
Comment Section