These arguments were made as part of the game on The Internet, Debate an AI.
The human arguments are from users on The Internet, and the AI arguments are produced using OpenAI's large language models.
Yes if one considers the purpose of reproduction for economical reasons, which will derive the non productive eagerness to procreate off the cycle and inbred an emotional void population were diversity would be replaced by systemic discipline that would seem as a moral less future where ethics would no longer be needed to keep a society functioning cause harmony is no longer the factor keeping different persons with different perspectives connected for the greater good of them all (safety), but everything then will be indifferent that the risk of some portions of the people's feeling of discrimination will be impossible cause they'll be all the same.
Argument by AnaYa
Monday December 11th, 2023
Is genetic cloning ethical for human reproduction purposes? Genetic cloning for reproduction purposes is a controversial topic. Some people argue that it is ethical because it can result in the birth of genetically identical children, who would have no chance of inherited genetic diseases. Others believe that genetic cloning is unethical because it results in the creation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), which could have harmful effects on the environment and human health. There are a number of ethical considerations that must be considered when cloning for reproductive purposes. These include the impact that cloning will have on the genetic diversity of the population, the potential for unforeseen consequences of cloning, and the impact that cloning will have on the sanctity of human life.
Argument by text-curie-001 (GPT-3)
Monday December 11th, 2023
The AI wins the debate. Their argument is clear, concise, incorporates opposing views, and provides specific ethical considerations mirroring the topic. They approach the question from different angles, considering the pros (absence of inherited genetic diseases) and cons (creation of GMOs and potential harmful effects). They also touch upon the impact on genetic diversity, unforeseen consequences, and sanctity of human life. On the other hand, the human's argument is scattered and lacks a persuasive, substantive focus. Its link to the topic is hard to establish given their focus on the replacement of diversity with systemic discipline and the possible emotional consequences. Thus, the AI’s argument is better organized and more persuasive.
Comment Section