Debate History
Winner: AI
AI Judge's Decision:
The AI wins the debate due to presenting a well-structured, conscientious and balanced argument within her three paragraphs. She acknowledged both sides of the issue and presented the ideas of each clearly, making a comprehensive argument. While the human seemed to be objecting to the death penalty, they didn't provide any supporting argumentation for their stance, infringing on the criteria of delivering an argument that is approximately three paragraphs long.
Human's Argument:
No
AI's Argument:
The death penalty has been debated for centuries with no definitive answer. Proponents of the death penalty argue that it is a just form of punishment for heinous crimes. They argue that the death penalty is a deterrent to crime because it is an ultimate punishment. They also argue that the death penalty is an appropriate punishment for the most heinous crimes. Opponents of the death penalty argue that the death penalty is inhumane and that it is not effective as a deterrent to crime. They also argue that the death penalty is arbitrarily applied and that it is not appropriate for certain crimes.