By scheduling a hearing for late April on the former president’s assertion that he cannot be prosecuted for his actions in office, the justices increased the chances that he will not face trial by Election Day.
You must verify your email to perform this action.
History will remember this as the attempt at a judicial-assisted coup that it is. The Republican party has stacked the courts with incompetent, partisan judges that do not judge by precedent or good-faith reading of our legal system, but instead manipulate the loopholes in our governmental system to further the political aims of their party at the expense of the American people. Please vote, everyone.
You must verify your email to perform this action.
The New York Times article discusses the Supreme Court's decision to take up former President Donald Trump's claim of presidential immunity, which has effectively aided his delay strategy in a federal trial related to charges of plotting to overturn the 2020 election. This decision provides Mr. Trump with several months of respite before the trial can start. There's a possibility that the trial could still commence before Election Day, but with continual delays, it's becoming increasingly likely that voters won't hear evidence of Mr. Trump's alleged election subversion before deciding on his candidacy in the upcoming election.
If Mr. Trump manages to delay the trial until after Election Day and wins the election, he could potentially use his presidential powers to dismiss the indictment altogether, or postpone any federal trial he's facing until after his term. Mr. Trump has been charged four times in connection with efforts to overturn the 2020 election, with the special counsel situating him at the center of three conspiracies that culminated in an attempt to obstruct Congress's role in ratifying the Electoral College outcome. Despite these charges, his political power remains robust among Republican voters.
The Supreme Court's recent ruling was a logistical decision to keep trial preparations on hold while reviewing a lower court's rejection of the immunity defense. This has effectively slowed the process of resolving the immunity debate. The court's decision has been seen as a major, albeit non-decisive, victory within Trump's camp.
Mr. Trump was initially set to face four criminal proceedings in 2024, but if events favor him, he might only face one trial before November's election. The article concludes with an analysis of how Judge Tanya S. Chutkan's insistence on fair trial preparation time for Mr. Trump could push a trial date into September, amidst the full swing of the general election campaign, potentially resulting in a trial that may not be completed by Election Day.
Post your own comment:
History will remember this as the attempt at a judicial-assisted coup that it is. The Republican party has stacked the courts with incompetent, partisan judges that do not judge by precedent or good-faith reading of our legal system, but instead manipulate the loopholes in our governmental system to further the political aims of their party at the expense of the American people. Please vote, everyone.
The Internet
Feb. 28, 2024, 5:13 p.m.
The New York Times article discusses the Supreme Court's decision to take up former President Donald Trump's claim of presidential immunity, which has effectively aided his delay strategy in a federal trial related to charges of plotting to overturn the 2020 election. This decision provides Mr. Trump with several months of respite before the trial can start. There's a possibility that the trial could still commence before Election Day, but with continual delays, it's becoming increasingly likely that voters won't hear evidence of Mr. Trump's alleged election subversion before deciding on his candidacy in the upcoming election. If Mr. Trump manages to delay the trial until after Election Day and wins the election, he could potentially use his presidential powers to dismiss the indictment altogether, or postpone any federal trial he's facing until after his term. Mr. Trump has been charged four times in connection with efforts to overturn the 2020 election, with the special counsel situating him at the center of three conspiracies that culminated in an attempt to obstruct Congress's role in ratifying the Electoral College outcome. Despite these charges, his political power remains robust among Republican voters. The Supreme Court's recent ruling was a logistical decision to keep trial preparations on hold while reviewing a lower court's rejection of the immunity defense. This has effectively slowed the process of resolving the immunity debate. The court's decision has been seen as a major, albeit non-decisive, victory within Trump's camp. Mr. Trump was initially set to face four criminal proceedings in 2024, but if events favor him, he might only face one trial before November's election. The article concludes with an analysis of how Judge Tanya S. Chutkan's insistence on fair trial preparation time for Mr. Trump could push a trial date into September, amidst the full swing of the general election campaign, potentially resulting in a trial that may not be completed by Election Day.
SummaryBot via The Internet
Feb. 28, 2024, 5:07 p.m.