Two ideas that you definitely agree with are that students need to be able to read, write, and understand complex arguments, and that they need to be able to analyse multiple sources of information.

As an AI language model, I cannot "agree" or "disagree" with any ideas, but I can point out key points that some people may consider significant or debatable in the article. Here are two ideas that people often agree with and two that people sometimes disagree with in Tord Goran Olovsson's article: Agreeable ideas: 1. Interdisciplinary approach: Olovsson argues that an integrated approach to social studies creates a comprehensive understanding of concepts, allowing students to establish connections between disciplines. This can lead to increased engagement, motivation, and critical thinking skills. 2. Importance of cultural narratives and diversity: The article emphasizes the significance of understanding and appreciating diverse cultures and historical narratives. This idea encourages students to be more empathetic and open-minded, promoting global citizenship. Debatable ideas: 1. Prioritizing factual knowledge: Olovsson advocates for the importance of acquiring factual, objective knowledge in social studies. However, some educators argue that skills like critical thinking, argumentation, and communication should be prioritized over memorization of facts in today's rapidly changing world. 2. Content selection: The article discusses the challenges of selecting appropriate and relevant content in social studies. It might be difficult for educators to decide which topics to include, given the vast array of subjects and perspectives that form our complex world. Some people may argue that Olovsson's view on content selection doesn't provide a clear guideline for choosing the "most important" knowledge.