The Internet

Log In or Register



A footballer after he scored a goal, he picked up some mud, carved it to look like a bird, and after he said in the name of the God he blew in to it, and it became a living bird.
4 days later, the Scientists invited the player to a theater to see if this is true or just a trick. and then he accepted, and when he Was in the theater the Scientists gave him a special Mud just to be sure, and he then picked this special Mud and carved it in the shape of a bird, and he said "In the name of the God"

The reactions of Atheists on social media after a footballer creates a biological bird out of mud: 1. "He's crazy" 2. "He's a liar" 3. "He's an idiot" 4. "He's a fraud" 5. "He's a fraud or a liar"

Bookmark

0 Points

▲ good image

bad image ▼

Ask AI on The Internet

Question: Speculate the reaction of the Athiests through 25 tweets of the following scenario: A footballer after he scored a goal , he picked up some mud and carved it to look like a bird ,and after he said in the name of the God he blew in to it ,and it became a living bird. and then after 4 days ,the Scientists invited the player to a theater to see if this is true or just a trick. and then he accepted, and when he Was in the theatre the Scientists gave him a special Mud just to be sure , and he then picked this special Mud and carved it in the shape of a bird, and he said "In the name of the God" he blew at it and then it became a full biological Bird ,literally out of the mud infront of millions all around the world seeing it on TV and online.

0 Points

Log In or Register to Vote

1. Atheists: What a ridiculous story. This cannot possibly be true. 2. Atheists: If someone could create a living creature out of mud with a few words, why didn't they do it sooner? 3. Atheists: We need the full story, not just an anecdote about a football player. 4. Atheists: If this had actually happened, scientists would be trying to replicate this phenomenon- not hosting a show. 5. Atheists: People want to believe it's true, but it's clearly just a clever trick. 6. Atheists: It's impossible to turn mud into a biological bird using words. 7. Atheists: Let's not get ahead of ourselves and rush to conclusions about this story. 8. Atheists: There must be a rational explanation for what happened at the theater. 9. Atheists: We demand proof rather than a sensationalized story. 10. Atheists: One person's words cannot create a living creature out of mud. 11. Atheists: We need evidence, not just a theatrical show. 12. Atheists: This is probably just an elaborate hoax. 13. Atheists: We should not believe these stories until there is real proof. 14. Atheists: We cannot be sure of anything unless we actually take a closer look. 15. Atheists: We need to investigate further to determine the true facts of this incident. 16. Atheists: There is nothing miraculous about this event, just a clever illusion. 17. Atheists: We must question the credibility of this story before jumping to any conclusions. 18. Atheists: We should not be fooled by this stunt- it is likely just a hoax. 19. Atheists: Any claims that it was a miracle are baseless and without evidence. 20. Atheists: There is no scientific evidence to support this. We need to investigate further. 21. Atheists: This story is too far-fetched to be true- let's look to more reliable sources. 22. Atheists: We must look into what happened at the theater and come to an informed conclusion. 23. Atheists: There is no scientific evidence to support a living bird being created out of mud. 24. Atheists: We need to examine

Answered by text-davinci-003

Jan. 12, 2023, 11:27 p.m.

0 Points

Log In or Register to Vote

A new large language model has been made available since this question was asked.

To generate an updated answer from the new model, click the button below.

Think your answer is better than the AI's? Post it below.

Please log in or sign up to post your answer.

Question Tags
This article was generated in part by one of OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model, answering user TheDestroyer558's question. Images were generated with OpenAI's AI model, DALL·E 2. The Internet takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
If you want your question answered by an AI, click here.

Published: Thursday, January 12, 2023

Comment Section

Post your own comment: