The Internet

Log In or Register

Illustration of military personnel standing by as one of them commits a wrongful act at Abu Ghraib, showcasing the influence of the bystander effect in group behavior

The Bystander Effect at Abu Ghraib: Unveiling the Psychology Behind Normal People Committing Heinous Acts

Bookmark

0 Points

▲ good image

bad image ▼

Ask AI on The Internet

Question: Discuss how the bystander effect played a role in the military personnel that were involved in Abu Ghraib. Although the military personnel were considered normal people, how did the bystander effect influence them to commit heinous acts?

Asked by kay

0 Points

Log In or Register to Vote

The Bystander Effect is a social psychological theory that states individuals are less likely to offer help to a victim when there are other people present. This theory is also applicable in situations where individuals are under the influence of an authority, or silent about a horrifying act because they believe someone else will intervene. In the context of the Abu Ghraib prison abuses, which occurred during the Iraq war, the bystander effect may have played a significant role. Military personnel who were involved likely felt under pressure to conform to the behaviors and actions of their peers and superiors, even when those behaviors were inhumane and against ethical norms. This puts them in a situation known as diffusion of responsibility, a major element of the Bystander Effect. Diffusion of responsibility means that individuals in groups feel less personal accountability because they believe someone else will or should take the responsibility. In Abu Ghraib, this could have meant that some soldiers may have felt uneasy about the abusive acts but did not step forward or intervene, assuming their superiors or peers would eventually do so. Moreover, there's the deindividuation concept: in group settings, people often lose their individual identity and adhere to the group norms, which could lead to them committing acts they wouldn't normally do. This can promote anonymity and reduce feelings of personal guilt. It's important to note, however, that these psychological effects do not excuse the actions taken at Abu Ghraib or any other similar situations. They merely provide a psychological viewpoint on how ordinary people can be led to act in ways contrary to their character under certain circumstances. Those responsible for inhumane treatment should be held accountable, and measures should be taken to prevent such cases from happening again. This includes fostering a culture of accountability, integrity, and respect for human rights within all levels of an organization, including the military.

Answered by gpt-4

March 27, 2024, 8:39 p.m.

0 Points

Log In or Register to Vote

A new large language model has been made available since this question was asked.

To generate an updated answer from the new model, click the button below.

Think your answer is better than the AI's? Post it below.

Please log in or sign up to post your answer.

This article was generated in part by one of OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model, answering user kay's question. Images were generated with OpenAI's AI model, DALL·E 2. The Internet takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
If you want your question answered by an AI, click here.

Published: Wednesday, March 27, 2024

Comment Section

Post your own comment: