Ask AI on The Internet
Question: We have pointed this out before but the idea seems to still have legs. This idea that people now owe compensation, reparations, to those in the New World who are descendants of those enslaved and transported there. Barbados is trying to collect on such a promise - or perhaps construct the argument that such a promise should be made. Lionel Shriver runs back with the usual arguments against. There is a much, much, simpler point to be made. So, make it again we shall. With the possible exception of poor, benighted, Haiti - the poorest place in the Western Hemisphere - those transatlantic descendants of those enslaved are better off than the descendants of those not enslaved in West and Southern Africa. We agree, slavery was vile. Yet the net effect of that movement of peoples, on people alive today, was to make better off those descendants of those enslaved. This is not something that compensation, reparations, can be paid for. No, we are not trying to justify slavery through this argument. No, the suffering then is not compensated for by the position now. Yes, it was a moral outrage and so on - we agree with all of the criticisms of the acts themselves. And yet the impact upon the economic lives of those here with us today was beneficial. Which isn’t something that can be compensated for. Which is, as far as we’re concerned, the end of that argument. We do indeed agree that this current world is not perfect, that things both can and should be done to make it better. Things we should do precisely in order to make it better for all of us - without regard to creed or colour. As Robert Wright points out, peace, easy taxes and the tolerable administration of justice would be a good start. As was pointed out a generation before the end of the slave trade, two generations before the end of slavery. So, about time we got on with it perhaps? Provide a 75-word minimum summary & reflection on What is the author arguing? And What information could you'd possibly use for your argumentative research essay to support your argument of slavery reparations should be implemented because of the lasting impacts of slavery on black americans, the economic benefits of reparations, and the moral obligation to right past wrongs?
The author argues that slavery reparations should not be implemented for the descendants of those enslaved in the New World, as the overall impact this has had on them is beneficial. They point out that, compared to the descendants of those not enslaved in West and Southern Africa, these people are better off. The author argues that things should be done to improve the world for all, rather than focussing on reparations for slavery. To support an argument in favour of slavery reparations, one could point out the lasting impacts of slavery, such as the racial wealth gap, racial disparities in health and access to education, and the fact that black americans often have worse job opportunities. The economic benefits of reparations could also be highlighted, as they could help to reduce this wealth gap and help people to access better opportunities. Finally, the moral obligation to right past wrongs could be discussed, as the injustices and inequalities of slavery still remain today.
March 7, 2023, 11:09 a.m.
A new large language model has been made available since this question was asked.
To generate an updated answer from the new model, click the button below.
Think your answer is better than the AI's? Post it below.
Other Most Relevant Posts:
Question Tags
If you want your question answered by an AI, click here.
Post your own comment: