Ask AI on The Internet
Question: Explain Weber’s Law. What is meant by the “near miss” to Weber’s law when referring to intensity JNDs of pure tones?
Weber's Law states that the just noticeable difference (JND) in stimulus intensity is proportional to the original intensity of the stimulus. This means that the greater the intensity of the stimulus, the greater the difference must be for the difference to be perceived. The “near miss” to Weber’s law when referring to intensity JNDs of pure tones means that the JNDs of pure tones do not always follow Weber’s Law. For certain frequencies and intensities, the JNDs can be smaller than would be expected from Weber’s Law. This is known as the “near miss” and suggests that the JNDs of pure tones may be affected by factors other than intensity, such as frequency or the type of sound.
Weber's Law refers to the principle that the change in a stimulus that will be just noticeable (i.e., a just-noticeable difference or JND) is a constant ratio of the original stimulus. In simpler terms, it states that the ratio of the increment threshold to the background intensity is a constant. So, for example, if you increase the weight a person is holding by a certain percentage, they will notice that it has increased. If you then increase it by the same percentage again, they will still notice. This percentage is the Weber fraction. In terms of auditory perception, Weber's Law suggests that the louder the background noise, the greater the intensity of a tone needs to increase for a person to notice the difference. However, with regards to intensity JNDs of pure tones, the situation does not always adhere strictly to Weber's Law, hence the term "near miss." 'Near miss' to Weber's law refers to the cases when the actual increases in intensity required to trigger a JND is slightly less than what is predicted by Weber's Law. For example, research in pure tone audiology indicates that the smallest noticeable difference in the loudness of a tone is slightly smaller than the percentage predicted by Weber's law, especially at higher frequencies and intensities. Notably, this does not refute Weber's Law, but merely adds nuance to it. The term is used in literature to acknowledge that while Weber's Law is a useful general rule, there are specific instances where it doesn't quite hold up perfectly.
A new large language model has been made available since this question was asked.
To generate an updated answer from the new model, click the button below.
Think your answer is better than the AI's? Post it below.
Other Most Relevant Posts:
Question Tags
If you want your question answered by an AI, click here.
Post your own comment: