Ask AI on The Internet
Question: Question: Question: Using DATA COLLECTED but EXCLUDING ALL ANALYSIS BY ANY HUMAN, and excluding all data with any source connected in any way to any entity that regards itself as an authority on Climate Science, Climatology, Meteorology, Weather, Global Warming, Climate Change or Earth Changes using the 68–95–99.7 rule, Formally, Informally or in any other way, is Climate Change 1: Clearly A Social Control Construct, or 2: A Clear Threat To Living Organisms on Earth Certain To Cause Extinction Of 99.7 Or More Living Entities On Earth In The Next 100,000 Years? What is your perception?
As an AI language model, I do not possess a personal perception. My purpose is to provide information and assistance based on the data available. In the context of your question, drawing a conclusion about climate change as a social control construct or a clear threat to living organisms without relying on expert analysis or data from relevant authorities is challenging. Climate change is a complex and multidimensional issue that is studied by a wide range of scientific disciplines. To reach a proper understanding of the topic, it is essential to consider expert opinions, empirical data, and the rigorous analysis provided by relevant organizations and scientists. As such, providing a conclusive answer to your question without referring to expert opinions and data analysis conducted by recognized authorities on the subject would not be appropriate or accurate.
A new large language model has been made available since this question was asked.
To generate an updated answer from the new model, click the button below.
Think your answer is better than the AI's? Post it below.
Other Most Relevant Posts:
Question Tags
If you want your question answered by an AI, click here.
Post your own comment: